Ultimate Tic Tac Toe™ by Relatable, Exciting Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X’s, 40 Mini O’s, 5 Large X’s, 5 Large O’s

11 reviews for Ultimate Tic Tac Toe™ by Relatable, Exciting Board Games for Family Gatherings, Great Games for Kids, Includes 1 Board, 41 Mini X’s, 40 Mini O’s, 5 Large X’s, 5 Large O’s

1. 

   Ronete Hamilton – January 20, 2026

   Great Game – Simple, Fun, and Keeps Kids Entertained for Hours!
   This game has been a big hit in our house! The rules are easy to understand, which makes it perfect for younger kids, but it’s still engaging enough to keep them coming back for more. Our children (ages 5–9) picked it up quickly and were playing confidently within minutes.The magnetic aspect adds an extra layer of excitement and strategy, and we love that it encourages problem-solving, turn-taking, and friendly competition. The pieces feel well-made and durable, which is always a plus with active kids.Overall, this is a fantastic family game that delivers hours of fun and entertainment. We highly recommend it for families looking for a simple, engaging game that kids will genuinely enjoy.

2. 

   One-Click Picks – January 20, 2026

   Simple rules, big laughs, even my 3-year-old wants to play every time.
   This game is way more fun than I expected. It’s simple to learn, super satisfying, and works great for family game nights. Honestly, even my 3-year-old loves playing with it (with supervision) — stacking, pulling the magnets apart, and laughing when they snap together.The magnets are strong, the pieces feel nice in your hand, and it’s one of those games that kids and adults keep coming back to.Only downside: the magnets are pretty strong, so you definitely want to keep an eye on younger kids and make sure pieces don’t snap together on fingers.Overall, really fun, quick to play, and surprisingly addictive. Great stocking stuffer or easy game night win

3. 

   KB Mom – January 20, 2026

   Exciting and Engaging Magnetic Game for Family Fun
   Kollide by Relatable is a fast-paced magnetic game that brings excitement to family game night. It’s designed for kids and adults alike, offering a fun and interactive way to test reflexes and coordination.Gameplay & Fun Factor:Kollide is easy to learn but challenging enough to keep everyone engaged. The magnetic elements make the game unique, adding an extra layer of strategy and excitement as players compete to score points. Rounds are quick, making it ideal for multiple playthroughs without losing interest.Quality & Design:The components feel durable and well-made. The magnetic pieces are strong, and the overall design is colorful and kid-friendly. Everything fits neatly in the box, which keeps setup and cleanup simple.Family-Friendly:This game is suitable for a wide age range, making it perfect for families with kids. It encourages hand-eye coordination, quick thinking, and friendly competition, all in a safe and enjoyable way.Portability:The compact box makes it easy to store or take on the go, whether for a playdate, travel, or family gathering.Final Thoughts:Kollide by Relatable is a fun, engaging, and well-designed magnetic game that adds energy and excitement to family game night. It’s perfect for kids and adults who enjoy interactive games that challenge reflexes and strategy, making it a great choice for family entertainment.

4. 

   Abbie – January 20, 2026

   Simple, fun, great for all ages
   This tower stack game is a blast! It’s easy to learn, fun to play, and great for both kids and adults. The pieces are sturdy and well made, and the game keeps everyone engaged and laughing. It’s perfect for family game nights, parties, or rainy days at home. A classic game that never gets old!

5. 

   Annette G. – January 20, 2026

   A great starter set with an imperfect rulebook
   I’ve been an Ultimate (“ULT”) enthusiast for some time, so when I saw an inexpensive new physical board on sale at Amazon, I thought I’d that I’d like to pick it up. Physical games make the pastime seem more serious, and it also ensures that people will place proper Xs or Os, instead of scribbling down random symbols. Now that I finally have purchased it, I thought I’d give a brief rundown of what it’s like here.* On the packaging *The main box opens up on the side, allowing the inside to slide out. Mine was taped shut, which a quick slash from a pocket knife quickly fixed.The inner box is aqua-colored cardboard, and initially holds the board, rulebook, and bags of pieces. I think the rulebook and an advertising leaflet were also entangled in there somewhere. (The miniboard covers were mostly in place on the board already, but one or two may have been loose.)My complaint with the inner box is that after you’ve taken everything out, it loses a little shape, and it’s not easy for someone with a poor grasp of managing space and physical objects to figure out how to repackage it. I’ll probably struggle with it for a while longer, to keep my set ‘complete’, but in the long run there’s a fair chance that I will end up discarding it. It’s a pity they didn’t find a way to turn it into a piece-holding mechanism so that it could be used for some purpose during play.The pieces come in two plastic bags. The bags are fine, although nobody will confuse them for premium-quality. Having logos on them instead of just the warning label would have made them look nicer and more official.Takeaway: Below average packaging, but adequate for the price.* On the components *The board is aqua plastic and measures a bit smaller than the average chess board. There are lines inside each miniboard to keep the pieces from sliding around; I’m pleased to report this feature works exactly as intended during ordinary play, although you might have trouble if you’re rough and start shaking things around. They also have notches to help the miniboard covers fit properly.The Xs and Os are purple and yellow, respectively. The colors are good, even if not my strict preference. The pieces are almost small, but well-formed and fun to manipulate. For OCD people it might have been nice if the bottom of the pieces were more distinguished from the top, so that you could pick out the correct side more easily, but you can easily argue that this being difficult to determine is a feature.My only significant complaint with the components is the board covers. Being opaque, they obstruct players’ view of pieces on the miniboards. It would be better if these were transparent, in the color of the side who owns them. The snapping might work a little too well; it can be tricky to get them off the miniboard. Finally, there are not quite enough of them: as contrived as it may be, it is theoretically possible to reach board positions where a player has captured 6 or even 7 boards. While 7 may be a bit much, I think 6 is a reasonable compromise that should cover all but the most extreme edge cases.Takeaway: Well done. The board covers are the only objective weakness.* On the booklet *“Orthodox” is defined as “what Ben Orlin’s guide says” for the purpose of this review. The rules for the game on the Wikipedia page happen to agree exactly with his and can also be used as a source.ULT terminology and nomenclature isn’t standardized, and so theirs is different from Orlin’s, from mine, and from several other sources, but the terms they use here are pretty clear and understandable even if they aren’t your preference.However, there are four notable variations in rules and terms from what’s orthodox, some minor and some major:1) The rules say you should ‘choose which player will play Xs and which will play Os’, but that the ‘youngest player goes first’. This is faulty on both counts: while it’s true players may personally prefer one shape or another to go first, the set’s own design assumes that X will go first, because there are 41 Xs and 40 Os. While it is, again, unlikely the entire board will be filled with pieces, it is theoretically possible, and it only works if X is the first mover. Regarding who goes first, this latter rule is typical for board game instructions, but unnecessary for an abstract skill game in the tradition of checkers and chess. If I were writing the rules, I would say that the less experienced player should go first, or if that is impossible to judge, the guest should go first (while the owner of the set plays second). Ideally the competition should be at least a two-game set, with the lead alternating between players.2) A miniboard being ‘won’ is referred to as it being ‘closed’ here. I’d guess they were trying to keep players from confusing winning a small board with winning the entire game. This isn’t really “wrong”, but it is unusual among ULT versions, and it’s unnatural for players coming from a tic-tac-toe background (which is virtually everyone).3) This set’s rule on free moves (the move that results from being sent to a won, or ‘closed’ board) reads, “If you are sent to a Small Game that is also ‘closed,’ you can go in any open Tiny Square you want.” This could be taken to mean that free moves only count if the move redirecting you to a won (‘closed’) board is itself on a won board. I don’t think this is what is intended, but it’s possible it’ll be interpreted this way. (In practice, I think people will figure out that free moves happen every time you’re sent to a won board, because playing this way would involve taking the board covers (“Big Pieces”) off every time.)4) 3 boards in a row (“3br”, or ‘3 in a row in the Big Game’, as they put it) still wins the game. However, they attempt to settle ties by the means of “whoever has more large pieces on the board”. This is a major deviation from orthodox ULT, an extra win condition that means this game is technically a hybrid between ULT and Tic-Tac-Ku, which uses the latter condition as its main scoring method. I suspect this change will tend to benefit X, which is dangerous given that X already has a first-move advantage. Although it hasn’t been studied, there’s the chance that this is just enough to shift a game that, like chess, is ‘almost certainly drawn’, to being a slight forced win.Grade takeaway: Has a good, succinct explanation of the tricky ideas in ULT, but the difference in win condition rule would make this a different game!* Final conclusions *While there are a number of computer versions of the game (I’m working on one which I hope will be the ultimate networked version), I’ve been sorry that there aren’t many physical editions. I bought this feeling that it was poised to take the ‘starter set’ position in the market. Now that I’ve bought it, I’m satisfied to give it a qualified endorsement for that purpose. This set is good for the price and worth buying, so long as players are aware that the provided rulebook deviates from the established order. A similar, premium set with higher-grade everything would be nice to see someday.

6. 

   Danielle Salsgiver – January 20, 2026

   Fun game that is quick to play and so easy to learn!
   Quick, easy, fun game. This is easy for all ages, from 5 to adult. We played several games in a row and really enjoyed the simplicity and challenge. Magnets are constructed out of durable material. The small bag makes this game easy to transport and store.

7. 

   Ana Castañeda – January 20, 2026

   Me gustó mucho y a mi familia le pareció bastante entretenido

8. 

   Tracijm – January 20, 2026

   Great fun for all ages.

9. 

   Ashley – January 20, 2026

   I bought this last Christmas after seeing it on tik tok. It has been one of our most played with family games. Easy to understand and play, very little set up required. Great fun for young children right through to older adults. Would definitely recommend for family night or get togethers.

10. 

    Barbara S Riddell – January 20, 2026

    Very good family game. My grandkids love it ! Lots of fun and well made.

11. 

    Amazon Customer – January 20, 2026

    Whole family enjoys this game! My 5 year old, my teens, my husband and I.